Sunday, April 19, 2009

Tea Parties? Tea-baggers? Whats All the Fuss About?

Last Wednesday there was a bunch of "Tea" Parties in cities across the country. I was not apart of any, since I was golfing, but greatly wished to go to one. I did do my own personal part, writing up a short "Federal Government Fact Sheet" outlining the size of the national debt, future obligations, and the nature of the federal reserve. I didn't leave my name or anything because I didn't want people judging the facts on preconceived connotations. Much like the MSM (Mainstream Media) has labeled these Tea Parties as "Right-Wing, Conservative" posturing. This makes me frankly, a little pissed off. Not so much at the MSM, but at the Republicans.

What's really going on? The Republicans are simply jumping on the bandwagon of anti-big government spending and control. These Parties are not about taxes, they are about BIG-government. If the Republicans had any intelligence they would realize they are just to blame as the Democrats currently in office. Here's a great video of a Republican Congressman being booed as he tries to speak at a South Carolina Tea Party. This is exactly what we need: anger, frustration, and a large crowd. Enough with the politics of old. It's time for real action, and REAL change. The Republicans and Democrats are not at opposite sides of the political spectrum, they are both on the far left. Let me explain.

The Political Spectrum is presented the following way. On the left you have Liberalism: freedom in personal choices but highly regulated business. The extreme to the left is Socialism. On the right you have Conservatism: highly regulated personal choices but freedom in business. The extreme to the right is Fascism. However we see the problem being that the two extremes are really two names for the same thing: Totalitarianism, complete governmental control. The way to remedy this seeming conflict is to re-imagine what the political spectrum is. Instead of liberal vs. conservative, we place total government control on the left and zero government control on the right. Modern liberalism and conservatism would lie near the middle-left on this spectrum.

So now that we see that the two "competing" ideologies in our country are really much more similar than we imagine them, we should start looking at other options. Libertarianism offers a real change to these failing ideologies. Libertarianism says we should have no regulations on personal behavior (drugs, prostitution, religion, etc) and no regulations on business (no central bank, no SEC, no IRS). Basically, NO government, the far right of the new political spectrum. It truly is the only way to bring about real change in our country today. We have to start realizing that our problems lie not in greed, lack of regulation, crooked banksters, etc.; but that government causes all these problems to manifest into the financial disasters we are experiencing today. I will try to address specific ways this is true in future posts.

So the tea parties were a start. A start to a hopefully growing sense of resentment at our government. Enough with the current conservative, republican calls to a "limited" government. Don't you realize there will never exist such a paradigm? Government will always grow out of its restraints, and become large once again. I believe that the only way to really fix our problems is to purge the source of the disease, the State.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Third Eye Blind In Albion!!!

Ahhhh I can't believe it but Third Eye Blind is playing tonight in our dear little Albion College. The best is that it's free! Every year the school sets aside a large amount of money in order to bring one large artist or comedian at the end of the year. When I first saw the signs for the event I got the stupidest grin on my face. I have been a HUGE fan of Third Eye Blind for about 10 years now but have never seen them in concert. I still maintain that "Motorcycle Drive By" is one of the all time greatest songs written. Anyways, the show is in about an hour and I hope it's as amazing as the songs. "the four right chords can make me cry..."

Monday, April 13, 2009

Happy Tax Freedom Day!

Congrats America! Today is the day that we have "technically" earned enough wages to pay all the government tax, but the CBO calculated that actually if you factor in the $1.5 trillion deficit (almost forgot about that little detail) tax freedom day is actually another 45 days away, on May 29th. But thats not that bad... working half the year just to pay the government, is it? I mean think about all the great things they're doing for us: buying "toxic" assets (what does that even mean?), buying trillions of dollars of failed mortgages and government securities (I believe the Onion ran a piece on this kind of spending...), firing CEOs, and who can forget Bo? ( I sure hope Obama kept his promise of keeping it a purebred, because God knows thats what we care about...)

Well maybe those things aren't quite working out so great, but at least the state is spending the rest of our tax dollars wisely... aren't they? Then how come in Hawaii residents used their own money and labor to fix a park that the government said would take millions of dollars and years to fix? Maybe it has something to do with the fact that private enterprise is both cost efficient and actually gets the job done.

The Reason Foundation has put together a couple videos for tax day to remind us what we're paying for: "Tax Facts to Make Your Head Explode" and "3 Great Reasons to Pay Your Taxes".

I already blogged about why taxes are legal theft here, so please read that to get my basic overview on how the government legally steals from you. Just think about it, if I came up to you, demanded 30% of your money, and pulled a gun on you if you didn't comply I would be thrown in jail as a petty crook! So how can we give the state power we as indivduals do not possess? We can't, it doesn't make moral, ethical, or logic sense whatsoever, but we accept it anyways.

The State is force, the State is aggression. I do not care what services they provide (they all suck anyways) the simple truth is they act with force and not by choice. Would anyone in their right mind actually pay their taxes if they had a real choice? Hell no! Everyone knows half the money is wasted on needless bureaucracy and after all of that we still get a half finished product.

Arguments for taxes I've heard have included: "If the government didn't provide roads, schools, or police we wouldn't have them", or "I don't mind paying taxes for health care and schools, I just don't support things like the War". Well both arguments are flawed. It's ridiculous to think the government is the only entity that could provide these services. If that's true we wouldn't have private schools, private highways, or private security... which we have them all and they provide vastly better service. And to say you support some things but not others the government does is to say you don't support the government at all. Because you are partly realizing the lack of choice that comes from forced taxes, and that the government has total control over your money and how it spends it. We must follow this to its logical end that the State is aggression and is no better than a gang or the Mafia.

Well this is not the most well put together blog post, but I'm glad I got some thoughts down. I also think I've set a new personal record for links (go me). Please comment and read! Thanks.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Money = Debt

This is quite a hard subject to address concisely but I will try my best to explain this system: the system of modern money. A system where money = debt.

Most every modern nation operates under what is called "fractional-reserve banking" in which a Central Bank controls the supply of a nation's money. In our country we have a Central Bank know as the Federal Reserve, but more on them later. To understand our 'modern' money system one must understand what fractional-reserve banking is.

When a commercial bank receives a deposit (e.g. you take your paycheck to the bank and put it into your savings account) the bank will add those funds into their reserves. Now many think the money is saved inside the banks vault and you can access that money at anytime. This is false. A bank does keep some money inside of its vaults but only the amount of reserve it is required to have on hand. This "reserve requirement" is set by the Central Bank, and is typically set around 10%. What does that mean? It means that for every $100 you deposit in the bank they will only keep $10 in their reserves.

So what happens to the the other $90? Well that money then becomes available for the bank to loan out, hence the name "fractional-reserve banking"--they only keep a fraction of deposits as reserves. The $90 can now be lent out as a loan since it is considered "excess reserves" and the bank is not required to place it in their reserves. Now for our example let us say the bank lends out the $90. What happens next? Well here is where the story gets interesting and complex so please pay close attention.

One would reasonably assume that $90 comes from the actual deposit of the $100, where $10 is keep in reserves, and the remaining $90 is lent out. But this is not the case. The bank actually keeps all $100. When it lends out the $90 it simply writes the money into their books and becomes new credit *tada!* in the form of $90 is suddenly created out of thin air. Now this is where most people become lost. How can the bank just write the $90 into their books if it does not exist? It is because the Central Bank grants commercial banks the power of money creation called the "money multiplier" or "multiple deposit creation" (link to federal reserve sheet). This process continues on as the person receiving the loan will then deposit the $90 in their bank, where they keep 10%, or $9, in their reserve, and can then loan out $81, and so on for theoretically infinity, until about $900 dollars, or 9 times the original deposit can be created from this system out of thin air. So again, the bank does not loan out the actual $90 it is not required to keep in reserves, it merely uses that money as a liability to back the creation of a new $90.

So here's the crux, here's where money actually equals debt. Because banks create this new money based off the promise of the debtor to pay back his debt, they do not actual loan out people's savings. New money is given value only by a debtors promise to repay the loan. Hence, money = debt. Let's continue to see the full effects of this.

The $90 from the original deposit is actually used by the bank for their own investments. This way if everyone decided at once to remove their money from the bank, the bank would default and fail. This is called a "bank run" and happened various times in history (most notably during the Great Depression). This happens because the bank only holds about 10% of all deposits in their holdings. The rest becomes invested in various funds or assets and would have to be liquidated (meaning sold off so the bank can receive cash for them) for the bank to recover all deposits. Considering the trillion dollar balance sheets of major banks, such a process is impossible. This is way such an institute as the Federal Reserve has to exist. Called the "lender of last resort" the Federal Reserve was established to prevent such disasters as bank runs, by being given the power to create their own money.

Take a look at a dollar bill. At the top you will see the words "Federal Reserve Note". You will also notice the words "This bill is legal tender for all debts public and private". What this means is that you are required by law to repay any debts in court with only these Federal Reserve Notes. The Federal Reserve controls the supply of money in the economy through the use of "Open Market Operations". These operations include the buying and selling of government securities, also known as bonds. Bonds are loans made to firms or institutions based off their debt. So in order for the Federal Reserve to introduce new "credit" into the financial system it buys and sells government bonds, aka government debt. So again we see the same formula, money = debt. The Federal Reserve prints up (or more specially enters into a computer a new entry) Federal Reserve Notes in exchange for Government Bonds. Debt for Money, Money for Debt.

What does this mean for me and you, normal everyday people? What this means is that we can never, never get rid of debt. Our entire monetary system is based on the application of debt in order to create money. The banks create money out of thin air, out of liabilities, and we wonder how in just a matter of days last Fall we "lost" trillions of dollars of wealth. And since the Federal Reserve inserts money into the economy through the purchase of government bonds, the United States will always be in debt--to it's own central bank. Money (like everything) has no reason to be controlled by the government. But first we must understand what money is to understand this.

Money has three functions: it acts as a store of value (you receive compensation for you work in the form of money as physical value), a unit of account (goods and services are quoted in terms of money), and a medium of exchange (it functions as a common good in use of market exchanges instead of straight barter). Money itself is a commodity--it is a good by itself-- but a commodity that is used as a medium of exchange. Examples of money have included: tree bark, seashells, wooden sticks, and most notably gold and silver. The reason people accepted these goods as a common medium of exchange is because they found value in them. The coinage of gold and silver throughout history has shown to be one of the most effective and accepted mediums of exchange, but anything can act as money as long as people find value in it and can effectively use it as a medium of exchange. In our Central Bank monetary system our money is pieces of paper. These pieces of paper themselves are so cheap in real terms that they are essentially worthless. The only reason our dollars have value is that people have faith in the Central Bank to keep the supply of currency in balance with the demand for goods and services. My question is then: why would we place such power in the hands of so few people?

Well, there is only two answers to such a question: our leaders are delusional and believe in faulty economics such as Keynesian, which tell them they have the power to fix entire economies; the other option is that they want power-- they want to control our lives in every way possible and controlling our money is one of the most potent ways to do it.

I could go on explaining how our system is both UnConstitutional and unethical but I have written quite enough. It is so important to understand this system, the effect it has on your life, and how broken it has become.

Further Study:
Zeitgeist Video explaining monetary system (I don't agree with this whole movie but their explanation of the monetary system is extremely well put together)

Money As Debt Video (great history behind our current system)

The Creature from Jekyll Island (overview of the Federal Reserve)

What Has Government Done to Our Money? (great book by the amazing Murray Rothbard)
please read as much as you can on Mises.org, it has an enormous amount of information available for free.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Getting Back Into the Swing of Things

It has been quite awhile since my last post. I've been lazy, and the people have responded (by people I mean myself because no one actually reads this blog). Well, I plan to start writing again, if for nothing just so I can work on my writing skills and explore my ideas through this medium.

I have begun applying for a Fall internship. So far I've just sent an application to the Cato Institute and I hope they accept me since thats my #1 choice. They are the foremost institute when it comes to Libertarian studies, and I know I could learn a lot from their researchers. My desire is to not just have these ideas about free markets, individualism, and so on -- I want to be able to empirically prove to people that these ideas work and present the evidence. Working at the Cato Institute I hope will provide me with a head start into such ventures.

I'm still torn however when it comes to what I want as a career. I still want to be involved in the business world, especially in resort/property development, but I feel such a call to activism that I have to pursue it somehow. I figure that if I devote most of my early career to research in economics and activism, it will allow me in the future to pursue my other interests such as development. You gotta follow your heart, and I can't ignore this passion within me. I hear all the time "Why do you care so much? You cannot change anything." And I'll admit, I feel that way sometimes. But if I do nothing, I'll have no right to object to what happens. If I do try, then at least I can say I gave it my all in the fight for a better world. Hell, I'm young; this is what we do right?

Maybe I'm wrong about everything. Maybe I'm only partially correct. But no one can ever know the absolute about anything, only try and get as close as possible to it. The point is we always need to be striving for that absolute, the unreachable perfection. It's what drives us to a better world, a better people, a better self. I don't think it actually exists--its just an idea. But what a powerful idea it is. All I want is for us as humans to realize the importance of reaching for that unattainable height, that unreachable precipice . We can always be better, we can always improve ourselves and our world. Not that we should lose ourselves entirely in this endless pursuit--we have to enjoy progress as it's made--but we should never settle. This should not depress us, feeling as if what we do is never good enough, but rather it should excite us to realize the boundless potential we posses. My hope is that I can live in a world where the only person who can hold you back is yourself. A world that encourages action and growth, not dependancy. It's not that hard to imagine. As John Lennon wrote, "It's easy if you try".

**Sorry for getting so philosophical, but it has been awhile since I've written**